Victoria
Victorian councils criticise Murray-Darling funding allocation plan
Seven Victorian councils say a proposed 140 million dollar funding plan fails to address the unique needs of Murray-Darling Basin towns.
A group of seven Victorian councils has criticised the state government's plans to distribute $140 million in funding intended for towns affected by Murray-Darling Basin water buybacks.
According to a wire report, the local government areas argue that the proposed allocation model fails to recognise the unique circumstances of each affected community. The councils have expressed concern that the funding strategy does not address the individuality of the different regions.
At this stage, the specific names of the seven councils involved in the protest have not been publicly confirmed. It also remains unclear exactly how the Victorian government intends to split the $140 million across the various municipalities, or what criteria are being used to determine the allocations.
The funding package is meant to offset the economic impact of water buybacks, a process where the government purchases water rights from irrigators to return water to the Murray-Darling river system. While these buybacks aim to achieve environmental outcomes, regional communities frequently warn that losing water entitlements reduces local agricultural production and damages local businesses.
The councils argue that because the economic reliance on water varies greatly from town to town, a uniform or generalised distribution of the funding will not work. They are calling for a model that takes into account the specific needs and distinct economic realities of each region.
The Victorian government has not yet confirmed whether it will review the funding distribution plan in light of the councils' joint criticism.
We will watch to see if the state government releases the specific funding breakdown or enters into negotiations with the disgruntled councils.
This report draws on original reporting by Wire report.
Dedicated to a Stronger Victoria.
A message from the editor, August
Every story here is free to read. Only readers keep it that way.
We take no government money, run no paywall, and answer to nobody in Spring Street. That independence is paid for by a small number of readers, not the many who benefit from it. If just one in a hundred of today's readers gave $8 a month, our Victorian politics coverage would be funded for the year.
- Funds reporting, not shareholders
- Cancel in one click, anytime
- Supporter badge and reply access
Prefer a one-off? Send a tip. It takes about twenty seconds.