Victoria
Victorian business groups warn against proposed work from home bill
Business leaders have warned that a proposed work from home bill could damage the Victorian economy and restrict workplace flexibility.

Victorian business leaders have issued a stark warning over a proposed work from home bill, claiming the legislation risks severely damaging the state's economic competitiveness. According to reporting by the Australian Financial Review, representatives from the business community have strongly criticised the draft laws, warning that the changes could "bomb us back to the Stone Age".
At this stage, the precise details of the proposed legislation have not been fully publicised, and the exact mechanisms of the bill remain unconfirmed. However, the strong language from corporate advocates underscores a growing tension between employers seeking to return workers to physical offices and legislative efforts to codify remote working rights.
It is not yet clear which specific industry sectors or business coalitions are leading this latest round of lobbying, nor has the Victorian Government released a comprehensive response to the characterisation of the bill. The debate highlights the ongoing friction in Melbourne's post-pandemic recovery, where central business district vacancy rates and municipal retail activity remain highly sensitive to office attendance patterns.
Workplace relations have become a key battleground in Victoria, with employers arguing that rigid legislative frameworks limit the operational flexibility required to run modern businesses. Opponents of the bill argue that mandating or heavily regulating work from home arrangements could stifle productivity, increase compliance costs for small businesses, and ultimately discourage investment in the state.
Watch for the Victorian Government's response to these business concerns and the formal introduction of the bill's full text to parliament.
This report draws on original reporting by AFR.
Dedicated to a Stronger Victoria.
A message from the editor, August
Every story here is free to read. Only readers keep it that way.
We take no government money, run no paywall, and answer to nobody in Spring Street. That independence is paid for by a small number of readers, not the many who benefit from it. If just one in a hundred of today's readers gave $8 a month, our Victorian politics coverage would be funded for the year.
- Funds reporting, not shareholders
- Cancel in one click, anytime
- Supporter badge and reply access
Prefer a one-off? Send a tip. It takes about twenty seconds.