Victoria
States set to reignite dispute over GST distribution deal
State governments are preparing to clash over the distribution of GST revenue, targeting a controversial funding deal.
State governments are preparing to reignite a long-running dispute over the distribution of the Goods and Services Tax, focusing on a controversial funding deal often described as a cash cow. According to reporting by AAP, the debate over how GST revenue is shared among the states and territories is set to return to the political centre stage.
Under the current arrangements, a system of horizontal fiscal equalisation ensures that GST revenue is distributed to states based on their fiscal capacity. However, a 2018 deal introduced a guarantee to protect Western Australia's share, a measure that other states argue has created an unfair playing field. The specifics of how the states plan to challenge this agreement in the upcoming discussions remain unconfirmed, but tension has been building for several years.
Victoria and other populous states have previously raised concerns about the fairness of the distribution system, particularly as state budgets face mounting pressures from infrastructure costs and public service delivery. The federal government has previously committed to extending the transitional funding arrangements, but the long-term future of the deal remains a point of significant friction.
At this stage, precise details regarding which state treasurers will lead the new push, or what specific alterations to the funding formula will be demanded, have not been publicly detailed. It is also unclear how the federal government intends to mediate the renewed dispute, or whether any formal timeline has been set for renegotiations.
Watch for upcoming meetings of state and federal treasurers to see if Victoria and other jurisdictions can negotiate a more favourable share of the national tax pool.
This report draws on original reporting by aapnews.aap.com.au.
Dedicated to a Stronger Victoria.
A message from the editor, August
Every story here is free to read. Only readers keep it that way.
We take no government money, run no paywall, and answer to nobody in Spring Street. That independence is paid for by a small number of readers, not the many who benefit from it. If just one in a hundred of today's readers gave $8 a month, our Victorian politics coverage would be funded for the year.
- Funds reporting, not shareholders
- Cancel in one click, anytime
- Supporter badge and reply access
Prefer a one-off? Send a tip. It takes about twenty seconds.