Victoria
Prosecutors oppose release of Canberra public servant accused of stalking
Prosecutors in the ACT have opposed the release of a government employee, arguing he is fixated on the alleged victim.
A Canberra public servant accused of stalking has had his potential release opposed by prosecutors, who argue the man has developed a fixation on his alleged victim.
According to reporting by Australian wire services, the matter was heard in a Canberra court where details of the prosecution's opposition to his release were outlined. The identity of the public servant and the specific government department he works for have not been publicly disclosed.
During the court proceedings, prosecutors argued against allowing the man back into the community. The prosecution presented arguments that the accused posed an ongoing threat to the safety of the alleged victim, citing what they described as a deep obsession.
The court heard that the man's alleged behaviour demonstrated he was fixated on the complainant. Prosecutors argued that this fixation meant there was a high risk that the man would seek to contact or endanger the safety of the woman if he were to be released.
Very few details about the specific nature of the stalking allegations or the relationship between the accused and the complainant have been made public at this stage. It remains unconfirmed what specific charges the man faces, or how long the alleged behaviour had been occurring before police intervention.
Legal representatives for the accused have yet to outline their full response to the allegations, and it is not yet confirmed whether the court has made a final ruling on his application for release.
The case is expected to return to court once the magistrate has considered the arguments from both the prosecution and the defence.
This report draws on original reporting by Wire report.
Dedicated to a Stronger Victoria.
A message from the editor, October
Every story here is free to read. Only readers keep it that way.
We take no government money, run no paywall, and answer to nobody in Spring Street. That independence is paid for by a small number of readers, not the many who benefit from it. If just one in a hundred of today's readers gave $8 a month, our Victorian politics coverage would be funded for the year.
- Funds reporting, not shareholders
- Cancel in one click, anytime
- Supporter badge and reply access
Prefer a one-off? Send a tip. It takes about twenty seconds.