Victoria
Premier defends gun buyback scheme ahead of election
The Premier and Prime Minister have defended a new gun buyback scheme as a necessary measure to improve community safety.
The Victorian Premier has defended a proposed gun buyback scheme, describing the policy as a price worth paying and declaring a readiness to fight for the measure at the upcoming election.
The policy, which has been championed alongside the Prime Minister, follows the Bondi Beach terror attack last year, according to reporting by the wire service. Both leaders have framed the buyback as a crucial step toward taking dangerous weapons off the streets and ensuring community safety.
The Bondi Beach tragedy has renewed national debates surrounding gun control, prompting both state and federal governments to consider more stringent public safety measures. By positioning the buyback as a core election issue, the Premier has signalled that firearm regulation will be a key point of difference for voters at the ballot box.
At this stage, specific details regarding the execution of the scheme remain limited. It is not yet confirmed which categories of firearms will be targeted under the buyback, nor has a formal budget or timeline for the policy been publicly released. Additionally, the exact mechanism for compensation for firearm owners has not been outlined.
While the Prime Minister has offered strong rhetorical support, the extent of federal financial involvement in funding the buyback remains unconfirmed. Gun owner advocacy groups and opposition MPs are expected to scrutinise the proposal, particularly regarding its overall cost and its efficacy in reducing violent crime.
Observers will now be watching to see when the government releases the detailed framework and financial costings for the proposed buyback scheme.
This report draws on original reporting by Wire report.
Dedicated to a Stronger Victoria.
A message from the editor, August
Every story here is free to read. Only readers keep it that way.
We take no government money, run no paywall, and answer to nobody in Spring Street. That independence is paid for by a small number of readers, not the many who benefit from it. If just one in a hundred of today's readers gave $8 a month, our Victorian politics coverage would be funded for the year.
- Funds reporting, not shareholders
- Cancel in one click, anytime
- Supporter badge and reply access
Prefer a one-off? Send a tip. It takes about twenty seconds.