Victoria
Indigenous Elder loses bid to appeal genocide case against King Charles
An Indigenous Elder has lost a legal bid to appeal a ruling in a genocide case brought against King Charles.
An Indigenous Elder has lost a legal bid to appeal a previous ruling in a lawsuit directed at King Charles and the Australian government.
According to wire reports, the legal action was launched to challenge the systemic disadvantages faced by Indigenous Australians. The core of the case alleges that King Charles, as the British monarch and Australia's head of state, along with the federal government and various public institutions, is actively perpetuating genocide.
The lawsuit argues that this genocide is being carried out through the maintenance of social, political and economic systems that consistently disadvantage Indigenous communities. The legal action points to a range of socio-economic measures where Indigenous Australians continue to experience poorer outcomes compared to non-Indigenous citizens.
The specific details of the initial ruling, including the name of the court that handed down the decision and the identity of the Elder who brought the challenge, have not yet been fully detailed in the initial wire reports. It remains unconfirmed which specific Australian jurisdiction rejected the latest application to appeal.
The case reflects a broader, ongoing debate within Australia regarding the historical and current impact of British colonisation on Indigenous peoples. Proponents of the lawsuit argue that systemic inequalities in health, education and incarceration rates are not merely historical legacies, but rather the result of active, ongoing institutional failures that amount to genocide under international standards.
Legal representatives for the Crown and the Australian government have previously sought to have similar structural challenges dismissed, arguing they lack a proper legal basis in domestic courts.
Observers will now watch to see whether the applicants attempt to take their legal arguments to international human rights bodies.
This report draws on original reporting by Wire report.
Dedicated to a Stronger Victoria.
A message from the editor, October
Every story here is free to read. Only readers keep it that way.
We take no government money, run no paywall, and answer to nobody in Spring Street. That independence is paid for by a small number of readers, not the many who benefit from it. If just one in a hundred of today's readers gave $8 a month, our Victorian politics coverage would be funded for the year.
- Funds reporting, not shareholders
- Cancel in one click, anytime
- Supporter badge and reply access
Prefer a one-off? Send a tip. It takes about twenty seconds.