Victoria
High Court emissions ruling sparks concern in Western Australia
The Western Australian government is seeking legal advice after a landmark ruling on overseas emissions from a New South Wales coal mine.
The Western Australian energy sector is raising concerns following a landmark High Court decision that mandates the consideration of overseas emissions for resource project approvals.
According to reporting by wire services, the ruling focused on a proposed coal mine in New South Wales. The High Court determined that emissions generated overseas from the burning of extracted coal must be factored into the environmental approval process for the project.
The decision has sent shockwaves through the resources sector in Western Australia, where major export projects form the backbone of the state economy. Industry representatives have sounded the alarm over the potential implications for future oil, gas and mining developments, which rely heavily on international buyers.
Western Australia's Treasurer expressed surprise at the High Court outcome. The Treasurer is currently seeking formal legal advice on how the ruling might impact the state's regulatory framework and existing approval processes.
Specific details regarding the name of the proposed New South Wales coal mine, the identity of the project proponents, and the exact legal advice being sought by the state government have not yet been disclosed.
Industry bodies are concerned that the precedent could lead to increased litigation, longer approval times and greater regulatory uncertainty for major resource projects across the country. Western Australia's heavy reliance on liquefied natural gas and iron ore exports makes the state particularly vulnerable to changes in how scope three, or indirect, emissions are assessed.
Observers will be watching to see how the Western Australian government responds once it receives its formal legal briefing on the decision.
This report draws on original reporting by Wire report.
Dedicated to a Stronger Victoria.
A message from the editor, October
Every story here is free to read. Only readers keep it that way.
We take no government money, run no paywall, and answer to nobody in Spring Street. That independence is paid for by a small number of readers, not the many who benefit from it. If just one in a hundred of today's readers gave $8 a month, our Victorian politics coverage would be funded for the year.
- Funds reporting, not shareholders
- Cancel in one click, anytime
- Supporter badge and reply access
Prefer a one-off? Send a tip. It takes about twenty seconds.