Victoria
Gina Rinehart criticises ABC Ombudsman over violent video ruling
The mining magnate says the national broadcaster's editorial standards require significant improvement following a ruling on a controversial broadcast.
Mining magnate Gina Rinehart has launched a sharp critique against the ABC Ombudsman, declaring that a recent finding by the internal regulator fails all Australian women and demonstrates a clear need for reform.
According to a wire report, the controversy stems from a segment aired on the ABC program Race Around the World. The broadcast in question featured a video describing a fictional scenario that depicted a violent attack on Mrs Rinehart.
Following a complaint regarding the segment, the ABC Ombudsman investigated the broadcast. However, the resulting finding has been rejected by Mrs Rinehart, who argues that the decision fails to uphold acceptable standards of decency and safety.
In a statement, Mrs Rinehart said the broadcaster's editorial standards require significant improvement. She suggested that by failing to properly address the depiction of violence against her, the Ombudsman's decision has broader implications for the treatment and safety of Australian women.
The precise reasoning behind the Ombudsman's ruling has not been disclosed, and the ABC has not yet publicly responded to the mining magnate's criticisms. It remains unclear what internal actions, if any, the broadcaster will take in response to the complaints about the fictional video.
Mrs Rinehart has long been a prominent figure in Australian public life, and this latest clash highlights ongoing tensions between high-profile figures and the national broadcaster over editorial accountability.
Observers will now be watching to see if the ABC issues a formal response to the criticisms or initiates a review of its editorial standards.
This report draws on original reporting by Wire report.
Dedicated to a Stronger Victoria.
A message from the editor, August
Every story here is free to read. Only readers keep it that way.
We take no government money, run no paywall, and answer to nobody in Spring Street. That independence is paid for by a small number of readers, not the many who benefit from it. If just one in a hundred of today's readers gave $8 a month, our Victorian politics coverage would be funded for the year.
- Funds reporting, not shareholders
- Cancel in one click, anytime
- Supporter badge and reply access
Prefer a one-off? Send a tip. It takes about twenty seconds.