Victoria
Federal minister rejects report recommending Western Australia GST cut
Federal Resources Minister Madeleine King has dismissed an interim report suggesting cuts to Western Australia's share of the GST.
Federal Resources Minister Madeleine King has strongly defended Western Australia's share of the Goods and Services Tax, rejecting an interim report that recommended reducing the state's portion of the national revenue.
According to reporting by a wire service, Minister King labelled the findings of the interim report as clearly incorrect. She emphasised that the resource-rich state retains the full support of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese regarding its current funding arrangements.
The distribution of the GST has long been a major point of political contention among Australian states and territories. Under a deal struck by the previous federal government in 2018, Western Australia was guaranteed a minimum return, known as the GST floor, to protect its state budget from volatile fluctuations in global iron ore prices.
Other jurisdictions have frequently argued that this arrangement unfairly disadvantages their own budgets, leading to ongoing reviews and public debates over the equity of the national distribution model.
Minister King's swift intervention highlights the federal government's sensitivity to the issue, particularly in Western Australia, where federal Labor holds several seats that are critical to its majority. The resources sector in the West remains a vital driver of the national economy, contributing significant tax revenues that support services nationwide.
While the minister has made her position clear, details surrounding the specific authorship and the broader contents of the interim report remain thin. It is not yet confirmed when the final version of the report will be formally delivered to the government or whether further adjustments to the distribution formula will be considered in the future.
Observers will now be watching to see how Eastern States premiers respond to the federal government's firm rejection of the proposed changes.
This report draws on original reporting by Wire report.
Dedicated to a Stronger Victoria.
A message from the editor, August
Every story here is free to read. Only readers keep it that way.
We take no government money, run no paywall, and answer to nobody in Spring Street. That independence is paid for by a small number of readers, not the many who benefit from it. If just one in a hundred of today's readers gave $8 a month, our Victorian politics coverage would be funded for the year.
- Funds reporting, not shareholders
- Cancel in one click, anytime
- Supporter badge and reply access
Prefer a one-off? Send a tip. It takes about twenty seconds.