Victoria
Council opposes $209 million Hindu temple in Cranbourne South
A proposed 64-metre tall Hindu temple in Melbourne's outer south-east faces opposition from local council over infrastructure and environmental concerns.
A proposed 209 million dollar Hindu temple in Cranbourne South, in Melbourne's outer south-east, is facing opposition from the local council over its scale and environmental impact. If built, the massive 64-metre tall structure would become the largest temple of its kind in Australia.
According to wire reports, the local council has formally opposed the development, citing major concerns about the pressure the facility would place on local infrastructure and the threat it poses to regional wildlife. The proposed site is located within a green wedge zone, a planning designation intended to preserve agricultural land, open space and natural habitats from high-density construction.
Opponents of the project argue that the size and height of the temple are inappropriate for the semi-rural area. The council is concerned that the local road network is not equipped to handle the significant increase in traffic that a major cultural destination would attract. Additionally, conservationists have warned that the construction could disrupt local wildlife corridors and harm native species in the sensitive green zone.
Detailed reports on how the development would manage waste, water and transport have not been finalised, and it remains unclear how many visitors the site is expected to attract on a regular basis. Representatives for the temple project have not yet confirmed whether they will modify the plans to address the council's specific objections or seek to bypass the local decision through state planning channels.
Watch to see whether the developers lodge an appeal with the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal to contest the council's position.
This report draws on original reporting by Wire report.
Dedicated to a Stronger Victoria.
A message from the editor, October
Every story here is free to read. Only readers keep it that way.
We take no government money, run no paywall, and answer to nobody in Spring Street. That independence is paid for by a small number of readers, not the many who benefit from it. If just one in a hundred of today's readers gave $8 a month, our Victorian politics coverage would be funded for the year.
- Funds reporting, not shareholders
- Cancel in one click, anytime
- Supporter badge and reply access
Prefer a one-off? Send a tip. It takes about twenty seconds.