Victoria
Complainant details alleged robe request in Alan Jones case
A man accusing broadcaster Alan Jones of indecent assault told a court he complied with a request to wear a robe.
A man accusing the veteran broadcaster Alan Jones of historical indecent assault has testified in court that he complied with a request to shower and wear a bathrobe because he did not want to disappoint the prominent media figure.
According to reporting by wire services, the complainant gave evidence detailing the alleged encounter, which forms a key part of the ongoing prosecution against the former radio host. The witness told the court that he followed the broadcaster's alleged direction to take a shower and then emerge from the bathroom wearing only a robe.
The court heard the complainant explain his state of mind during the alleged incident, which took place several years ago. He testified that his decision to follow the directions was driven by a strong desire to avoid causing disappointment to Mr Jones, who at the time held a highly influential position in Australian media and public life.
The allegations form part of a broader legal case involving charges of historical indecent assault against the former broadcaster. Mr Jones has previously defended his reputation and strongly denied the allegations of inappropriate conduct brought against him.
The court proceedings are expected to continue over the coming weeks, with judicial officers hearing further details of the allegations as both the prosecution and the defence present their arguments. Legal representatives for Mr Jones are expected to carefully examine the timeline and details of the allegations as the hearings progress.
Observers will now watch to see how the defence legal team addresses this specific testimony during the cross-examination of the complainant.
This report draws on original reporting by Wire report.
Dedicated to a Stronger Victoria.
A message from the editor, August
Every story here is free to read. Only readers keep it that way.
We take no government money, run no paywall, and answer to nobody in Spring Street. That independence is paid for by a small number of readers, not the many who benefit from it. If just one in a hundred of today's readers gave $8 a month, our Victorian politics coverage would be funded for the year.
- Funds reporting, not shareholders
- Cancel in one click, anytime
- Supporter badge and reply access
Prefer a one-off? Send a tip. It takes about twenty seconds.