Australia
Alan Jones accuser denies seeking money from police report
A man accusing former broadcaster Alan Jones of indecent assault has denied making a police complaint to obtain financial gain.
A man accusing the former radio broadcaster Alan Jones of indecent assault has rejected suggestions that he made a police complaint in order to obtain money. The denial was made in a Sydney court during cross-examination, according to wire reports of the proceedings.
The complainant, who alleges that Jones indecently assaulted him when he was a 17-year-old, was questioned closely by the defence. During the hearing, the former broadcaster's lawyer put it to the man that his motivation for contacting the police was financial. The accuser denied the assertion, maintaining that his report was not motivated by a desire to get money.
Further details regarding the alleged incident, including the specific date, time, and location of the events, remain scarce in the initial reports. The identity of the man making the accusations is also legally protected. It is not yet confirmed how many charges Jones faces in relation to this specific complainant, or how many other witnesses are expected to give evidence during this stage of the court proceedings.
Jones, a highly influential and veteran figure in Australian media, has denied the allegations. His legal team is actively contesting the claims in court, focusing on the motives and credibility of the accuser.
As the proceedings are in their early stages, many of the broader legal arguments and evidentiary submissions have not yet been made public. Observers expect the case to draw significant public attention given Jones's prominent career in talkback radio and public life.
The Sydney court is expected to hear further evidence from the complainant as the cross-examination continues.
This report draws on original reporting by Wire report.
Dedicated to a Stronger Victoria.
A message from the editor, August
Every story here is free to read. Only readers keep it that way.
We take no government money, run no paywall, and answer to nobody in Spring Street. That independence is paid for by a small number of readers, not the many who benefit from it. If just one in a hundred of today's readers gave $8 a month, our Victorian politics coverage would be funded for the year.
- Funds reporting, not shareholders
- Cancel in one click, anytime
- Supporter badge and reply access
Prefer a one-off? Send a tip. It takes about twenty seconds.